A Call to Action · Protect the E-Rate Program

E-Rate built the broadband under every school in Chester County. Now the FCC is proposing to dismantle it.

$16.6M

Federal E-Rate funding committed to public schools across Chester County over the past decade1 — the connectivity backbone that a new FCC rulemaking now puts at risk.

$1.5M
committed to the county every year — steady federal support that is now on the table1
12
public school districts funded, all connected through the CCIU-affiliated county WAN4
76%
of district funding serves non-rural schools — a rural-only rule would strand most of the county3
71,273
public-school students across Chester County whose classrooms E-Rate keeps connected2

What’s at stake

A proven program faces its biggest threat.

E-Rate is the fifth largest stream of federal funding in the nation’s schools. It is the only federal education technology program, and over nearly 30 years it has consistently, effectively and responsibly supported connectivity for schools and libraries in every one of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties. In June 2026 the FCC opened a rulemaking that asks whether it should continue.

What you need to know

E-Rate connects schools

E-Rate helps schools and libraries access the affordable broadband that supports the connectivity and network modern buildings need to carry on the important work of serving students and patrons.

$16.6M committed · 12 public school districtsSee it on the interactive map →
What the FCC proposal would do

E-Rate is a proven program that has single-handedly transformed internet access in classrooms. The program has a long track record of success and enjoys strong bi-partisan support on Capitol Hill. The FCC’s review is expansive and asks more than 100 questions about the program, its future, and its structure.

Read a summary of the FCC’s NPRM (PDF) →

How you can engage

Call to Action

Here’s everything you need to know about WHY your voice matters, HOW to craft your response, and WHERE to file it with the FCC.

Comments are due October 13, 2026Read our Call to Action (PDF) →
FAQs

We are fielding a lot of questions as members work through the proposal and begin writing their comments. We have some answers!

Read our FAQ for more information (PDF) →

The summary, Call to Action and FAQ are published by AASA, The School Superintendents Association and the Association of Educational Service Agencies, co-branded with the Pennsylvania Digital Trust Hub and the Allegheny Intermediate Unit. Read the AASA blog →

Where the money goes

Two categories. One connected classroom.

E-Rate funds arrive in two forms. Category 1 pays for the broadband circuits that reach the building — much of it carried over the shared county WAN. Category 2 pays for the Wi-Fi and switching that carry it to every desk. Across Chester County the balance tilts toward Category 2 — $9.7M for internal networks against $6.9M for connectivity — as districts build and refresh the Wi-Fi and switching inside every school.1

Category 1 · Connectivity to the school
$6.9M
Fiber, internet access, and wide-area circuits — much of it delivered over the CCIU-affiliated county WAN.
Category 2 · Networks inside the school
$9.7M
Wi-Fi access points, switches, and internal cabling — the network that reaches every classroom and student.

Annual E-Rate commitments across Chester County

Category 1Category 2

FY2026 is still open — its lighter bar shows partial-year commitments to date. All 12 public districts of Chester County (Intermediate Unit 24), funding years 2016–2026. Committed federal share, de-duplicated to the funding-request level. Source: USAC Open Data.

Support that follows need

The less a district can afford, the more E-Rate provides.

E-Rate scales its support to a district's share of economically disadvantaged students, so the county's highest-need districts draw the deepest support: Coatesville Area and Oxford Area qualify at the maximum 90% rate, while others receive 40–60%.2 But every district in the county depends on the program — a rural-only rule would strand the eight districts USAC labels non-rural, Coatesville among them, and a sunset would end this support for all twelve at once.3

90%Coatesville Area, Oxford Area
80%Octorara Area
60%Kennett Consolidated, Owen J Roberts
50%West Chester, Unionville-Chadds Ford, Phoenixville, Avon Grove
“The loss of E-Rate funding would have a significant impact on schools across our region by reducing their ability to afford the reliable broadband, networking, hardware, and cybersecurity services that support daily teaching, learning, and operations. Many districts, particularly those with limited local resources and declining enrollment, would be forced to delay or scale back critical technology investments, resulting in increased costs and reduced access to digital learning opportunities for students.”
— Jessica Sahl, Assistant Division Director, Technology Services, Chester County Intermediate Unit 24
See every Chester County district by discount rate
90%Coatesville Area, Oxford Area
80%Octorara Area
60%Kennett Consolidated, Owen J Roberts
50%West Chester Area, Unionville-Chadds Ford, Phoenixville Area, Avon Grove (4 districts)
40%Downingtown Area, Tredyffrin-Easttown, Great Valley (3 districts)

Coordinated across the county

A shared county backbone: the CCIU-affiliated WAN.

Chester County's schools are connected through a shared county wide area network — operated as a separate 501(c)(3) affiliated with the Chester County Intermediate Unit (chesco.net).4 It serves 25 member entities — public school districts, career & technical centers, charter and non-public schools, county government, and higher education — delivering internet connectivity, WAN connectivity, DNS, network monitoring, and DDoS protection across the region. Because the WAN bills its members directly, its E-Rate-funded connectivity is captured in each district's own filings above rather than a separate consortium line — but it is the shared backbone those dollars sustain.

This is exactly the regional coordination the NPRM would undercut — the mechanism that lets 25 institutions across one county share resilient, secure infrastructure that no single district could build or defend alone.

25
member entities on the shared county WAN — districts, CTCs, charter & non-public schools, county government & higher education4

5
services delivered region-wide: internet, WAN, DNS, network monitoring & DDoS protection

$16.6M
total E-Rate committed across the county's 12 public school districts

The receipts

What E-Rate delivered, district by district.

Lifetime E-Rate commitments, funding years 2016–2026, for all 12 public districts of Chester County (Intermediate Unit 24).1 The 90% badge marks maximum-discount, highest-need districts.

Select any district name to see it highlighted on the interactive map.

Lifetime E-Rate commitments for all 12 Chester County (Intermediate Unit 24) public districts, funding years 2016–2026: Category 1, Category 2, and total committed amounts.
DistrictCategory 1Category 2Total funded
Coatesville Area 90%$1.7M$1.1M$2.8M
West Chester Area$935K$1.5M$2.4M
Downingtown Area$693K$1.4M$2.1M
Kennett Consolidated$857K$545K$1.4M
Oxford Area 90%$502K$745K$1.2M
Unionville-Chadds Ford$526K$606K$1.1M
Tredyffrin-Easttown$167K$922K$1.1M
Phoenixville Area$86K$922K$1.0M
Great Valley$475K$395K$870K
Avon Grove$404K$456K$860K
Owen J Roberts$283K$545K$828K
Octorara Area$275K$465K$740K

All 12 Chester County districts shown. Figures are USAC-committed federal amounts, de-duplicated to the funding-request level (one commitment per request, not per school served). Connectivity delivered over the shared county WAN is billed to member districts, so it appears in these district totals rather than a separate consortium line.

See it on the map

Open the interactive map →

See Chester County on the map.

Every district’s E-Rate funding, drawn straight from USAC’s public data. Hover or tap any district for its Category 1 and 2 totals, discount rate, and USAC urban/rural label.

Your voice is needed — now

Take action to protect E-Rate.

The FCC’s comment period on Docket 26-133 closes October 13, 2026 — a narrow window to show the Commission and Congress what these changes would cost our schools. Here are three ways to help, in the order that matters most.

Step 1 · Sign on

Sign on with the Digital Trust Hub

Add your district or organization to our coalition standing up for E-Rate. One signature adds your name to the comment we file with the FCC on Docket 26-133 and to our coalition’s letters to lawmakers.

Sign your district on →
▶  We carry your name to the FCC and to Congress
Step 2 · File your own comment

Write your own comment to the FCC

Your own comment is counted separately from ours, and the Commission weighs individual, evidence-based comments far more heavily than identical form letters. Our partners at AASA (The School Superintendents Association) have a guided tool that turns your words and your organization’s real E-Rate figures into a comment ready to file.

Figures in the builder cover FY2021–25; this page covers FY2016–26. Both are USAC data — they count different years.

Build your FCC comment →
▶  Comments are due October 13, 2026
Step 3 · Contact your legislators

Tell Congress to protect E-Rate

Reach out directly to your lawmakers. Our partners at the Consortium for School Networking (CoSN) have a one-click tool that finds your U.S. Senators and Representative and sends them your message.

Contact Congress now →
▶  Important — but less time-sensitive than the FCC filing

Your Pennsylvania delegation

The tool routes to your exact offices automatically. For Chester County that means your two U.S. Senators — Sen. John Fetterman and Sen. Dave McCormick — and your U.S. Representatives — Rep. Mary Scanlon (PA‑05), Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (PA‑06), and Rep. Lloyd Smucker (PA‑11) — depending on where you live.

Short on words? Use this template for Step 3 ↓
Sample letter to Congress
Dear [Senator / Representative], I'm writing as a constituent to ask you to protect the federal E-Rate program from the changes in the FCC's current rulemaking. E-Rate is the connectivity backbone of our public schools. In Chester County it has committed $16.6 million over the past decade, including the shared county wide area network that connects our schools. Proposals to sunset the program, limit it to rural schools, or exclude PreK and Head Start would fall hardest on the students who can least afford to lose their connection. Please oppose any changes that would weaken E-Rate for the schools and libraries in our community. Thank you, [Your name], [Your community]

Make it local: find your district on the county map and drop your own numbers into the letter — a message grounded in your district’s figures lands hardest.

Sources

The data behind this page.

Every figure on this page comes from USAC's public federal E-Rate Open Data, funding years 2016–2026. Each source is linked below. How we pulled and de-duplicated this data →

  1. E-Rate funding committed to the county. The federal share of Funded requests for the 12 Chester County (Intermediate Unit 24) districts — $16.6M, FY2016–2026.
  2. Discount rates & student need. Category 1/2 discount rates and the school-level free/reduced-lunch (NSLP) percentages that set them, plus full-time enrollment (~71,300 students).
  3. Urban / rural classification. USAC's urban/rural status for each funded service — 8 of the county's 12 districts labeled Urban and 4 Rural (76% of district funding non-rural), so a rural-only rule would strand most of the county's funding.
  4. The Chester County WAN. The county's shared wide area network is operated as a separate 501(c)(3) affiliated with the Chester County Intermediate Unit (chesco.net), serving 25 member entities across five sectors. Its E-Rate-funded connectivity is billed to member districts and so appears within each district's committed total rather than under a separate consortium Billed Entity Number. Membership and service details provided by the CCIU technology office.
  5. Target universe & Billed Entity Numbers. The 12 Chester County IU 24 (Intermediate Unit 24) member districts — each entity's Billed Entity Number confirmed against USAC's public entity records.
    USAC entity lookup 7i5i-83qf ↗
  6. Proposed FCC rule changes. Summarized from the member advocacy update by the Association of Educational Service Agencies (AESA) — with the School Superintendents Association (AASA), the Association of School Business Officials (ASBO), and the National Rural Education Association (NREA) — on the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) reviewing the E-Rate program.

Backed by Pennsylvania's education community.

This statewide effort is supported by Pennsylvania's education associations, standing together to protect the connectivity and security our schools depend on.

This site uses privacy-respecting, anonymized analytics — including session analytics — to help us improve it. No personal information is collected on these pages.